From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:27:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20975.1585337221@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158533333892.13411.4384511509626622379.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org>
References: <16040-eaacad11fecfb198@postgresql.org>
<CAFj8pRBfi7fNtRLsAsCo0Y-mm+X6Y=9Z1ce8bocbWP5MQ65irQ@mail.gmail.com>
<158533333892.13411.4384511509626622379.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org>
Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com> writes:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> Implements feature: tested, passed
> Spec compliant: tested, passed
> Documentation: tested, passed
> All good with this patch.
Thanks for testing!
Anybody have an objection to cramming this into v13? It is a bit late,
but it seems like a performance bug fix ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, hamid.akhtar@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan
In-Reply-To: <20975.1585337221@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox