pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: sk@zsrv.org
Cc: michael.paquier@gmail.com
Cc: x4mmm@yandex-team.ru
Cc: david@nlpgo.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using a composite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 15:39:18 -0500
Message-ID: <22609.1519936758@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180124.161153.214591193.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20180118082505.GA84508@paquier.xyz>
	<20180118.211449.240575561.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<348951516742031@web54j.yandex.ru>
	<20180124.161153.214591193.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> At Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:13:51 +0300, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote in <348951516742031@web54j.yandex.ru>
>> Should we also make backport to older versions? I test on REL_10_STABLE - patch builds and works ok, but "make check" fails on new testcase with error:
> CREATE INDEX ON t USING gist (a test_inet_ops, a inet_ops);
> + ERROR:  missing support function 4 for attribute 1 of index "t_a_a1_idx"
>> and with different explain results.

> Thank you for checking that. d3a4f89 allowed that and
> inet_gist_decompress is removed at the same time. Unfortunately I
> didn't find a type on master that has both decompress and fetch
> methods so I prefer to split the regression patch among target
> versions.

I pushed this fix with minor adjustments.  I did not like the proposed
regression test at all: it was overcomplicated and the need for different
versions for different back branches wasn't fun either.  After some poking
around I found that the bug could be exhibited using just btree_gist's
gist_inet_ops, since the core inet_ops class indexes the same datatype and
it does have a fetch function.  So I added a test case in btree_gist.

			regards, tom lane




view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <22609.1519936758@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../22609.1519936758@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/22609.1519936758@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, sk@zsrv.org, michael.paquier@gmail.com, x4mmm@yandex-team.ru, david@nlpgo.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using a composite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.
  In-Reply-To: <22609.1519936758@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox