From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:24:43 -0400
Message-ID: <2852940.1710599083@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fddd1cd6-dc16-40a2-9eb5-d7fef2101488@technowledgy.de>
References: <fddd1cd6-dc16-40a2-9eb5-d7fef2101488@technowledgy.de>
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> writes:
> - LD_LIBRARY_PATH is used correctly to look for the direct dependency
> loaded in dlopen(...), but is not taken into account anymore when trying
> to locate libpq.so. This step only fails with musl, but works fine with
> glibc.
Why do you think this is our bug and not musl's? We do not even have
any code that knows anything about indirect library dependencies.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, walther@technowledgy.de, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
In-Reply-To: <2852940.1710599083@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox