pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: andrewbille@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:56:57 -0400
Message-ID: <3667394.1664287017@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzJwcL71yaWqCVJ1@paquier.xyz>
References: <CAD21AoDWHkBBGvvJuLEBqMjiPiYOiVJ6voFBWYbOBsU+-Cot2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220628003720.GG19662@telsasoft.com>
	<CAD21AoBz4xZ3uOZS+xYENsYta4PPPkGYPDzzPqqw5GJgrQC7hg@mail.gmail.com>
	<Yrv1nRsfasco768G@paquier.xyz>
	<CAD21AoC8FQqHY8knG7+6-eQe39wjXPtqyki29OAb5OHhq7-p+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoD6n62NXB5OuYSONYHKNkR=fqvJ5+82y=4Z=-KuFeOV0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<2604497.1664053071@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<YzEfR9UUb3gqRjoA@paquier.xyz>
	<3268290.1664165270@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<YzJwcL71yaWqCVJ1@paquier.xyz>

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> As we are talking about a description with GUC_ACTION_SAVE, something
> like "Parameters with this flag do not support RESET, or SET in the
> context of a function call"?  NO_RESET sounds a bit confusing as a
> name if you consider this second part (it can be understood as
> resetting the value as well), but keeping it as-is does not look like
> a big deal to me with this description, or an equivalent, in place.

Yeah, we already talked upthread about how the SAVE restriction makes
"NO_RESET" a bit of a misnomer.  Nobody proposed a better name though.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (44+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3667394.1664287017@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../3667394.1664287017@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3667394.1664287017@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com, d.koval@postgrespro.ru, dilipbalaut@gmail.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end
  In-Reply-To: <3667394.1664287017@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox