From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: bzm@2bz.de
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #17957: psql-16beta1 \df+ does not show the function body
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:18:09 -0400
Message-ID: <48277.1685657889@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHjwIHz/26HITdUC@momjian.us>
References: <17957-e1db8b1c15af444a@postgresql.org>
<ZHjwIHz/26HITdUC@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 05:57:19PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> The release notes do not mention \df+.
> We had this commit in PG 16:
> Show "internal name" not "source code" in psql's \df+ command.
> I didn't think anyone would mind the change so I didn't document it in
> the release notes --- should I?
I think it needs to be mentioned, since it's a nontrivial user-visible
behavioral change. I'm not sure it's a compatibility item, but it
ought to be there somewhere.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, bzm@2bz.de, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #17957: psql-16beta1 \df+ does not show the function body
In-Reply-To: <48277.1685657889@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox