From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov@mail.ru>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]:
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 09:14:20 -0400
Message-ID: <6214.1590671660@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528065948.GC3460@paquier.xyz>
References: <1590486572.205117372@f500.i.mail.ru>
<cca87255-7dea-6aac-2e9a-35dfe3776122@2ndquadrant.com>
<1590501239.839686286@f437.i.mail.ru>
<17907.1590504619@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200527074736.GG103662@paquier.xyz>
<5816.1590581923@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200528065948.GC3460@paquier.xyz>
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> I don't think we should have any duplication between the REINDEX and
> reindexdb pages, and we have that in reindexdb:
> --concurrently
> Use the CONCURRENTLY option. See REINDEX for further information.
> An idea would be to append to the second sentence something like
> "where all the caveats of this option are explained in details"?
+1, but I'd change the whole sentence. Maybe
Use the CONCURRENTLY option. See REINDEX, where all the caveats of
this option are explained in detail.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, aaklychkov@mail.ru, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]:
In-Reply-To: <6214.1590671660@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox