From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Godfrin, Philippe E <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>
Cc: Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ERROR: insufficient columns in the PRIMARY KEY constraint definition
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:16:33 -0400
Message-ID: <840317.1601475393@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA0PR15MB3933EFB54C75C63B490CAEBA82330@SA0PR15MB3933.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAApHDvpE5omXqenT5wFLHigbJFjixqUC-DkcTw6aCFoMLmU2jw@mail.gmail.com>
<20200929232225.GA16296@alvherre.pgsql>
<SA0PR15MB3933EFB54C75C63B490CAEBA82330@SA0PR15MB3933.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
"Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com> writes:
> I am curious why this is considered Class 0A, versus 42 (syntax error?)
FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED seems perfectly appropriate from here.
What you tried to do is not semantically nonsensical, it's just something
we can't do given the current architecture for partitioned tables.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, dgrowleyml@gmail.com, nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ERROR: insufficient columns in the PRIMARY KEY constraint definition
In-Reply-To: <840317.1601475393@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox