pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: buschmann@nidsa.net
Cc: noah@leadboat.com
Cc: tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
Cc: bruce@momjian.us
Cc: andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:36:50 +0900
Message-ID: <YZXYYilLM1exwk2v@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b8ebc97-829c-4a40-efcc-761f52bffb0d@dunslane.net>
References: <d9f14840-9f6e-183d-f43a-9f9b9e1b6d19@enterprisedb.com>
	<1575064.1615060903@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20210430183348.GQ27406@telsasoft.com>
	<a31d593da98da15fc2302a16b3f3b32e491d3e49.camel@vmware.com>
	<20210912005116.GF26465@telsasoft.com>
	<YVa/se5gxr1PsXDy@paquier.xyz>
	<YWPNxDWFia+V4Y4g@paquier.xyz>
	<20211107192200.GK17618@telsasoft.com>
	<YZSov33oDwW44uMs@paquier.xyz>
	<0b8ebc97-829c-4a40-efcc-761f52bffb0d@dunslane.net>

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:07:17AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> In general I'm in agreement with the direction here. If we can have a
> script that applies to back branches to make them suitable for upgrade
> testing instead of embedding this in the buildfarm client, so much the
> better.

Okay.  I have worked on 0001 to add the table to check after the
binary compatibilities and applied it.  What remains on this thread is
0002 to move all the SQL queries into a psql-able file with the set of
\if clauses to control which query is run depending on the backend
version.  Justin, could you send a rebased version of that with all
the changes from the buildfarm client included?
--
Michael

Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../YZXYYilLM1exwk2v@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (36+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <YZXYYilLM1exwk2v@paquier.xyz>
Permalink:  ../YZXYYilLM1exwk2v@paquier.xyz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/YZXYYilLM1exwk2v@paquier.xyz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, andrew@dunslane.net, pryzby@telsasoft.com, pchampion@vmware.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, buschmann@nidsa.net, noah@leadboat.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, bruce@momjian.us, andres@anarazel.de
  Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types
  In-Reply-To: <YZXYYilLM1exwk2v@paquier.xyz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox