pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Cc: exclusion@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18500: Detaching a partition with an index manually attached to the parent's index triggers Assert
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:15:09 +0900
Message-ID: <Zn9SDY0r9fLTqqDO@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202406281127.piekjwgnulgf@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <CAHewXNkyq88YBfCMbgnbquEwi+f5nyGOZ1axmo4ueLmkC=Am_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<202406281127.piekjwgnulgf@alvherre.pgsql>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 01:27:17PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I guess you could also fix this by adding a PK constraint to the parent
> table, so that the situation is consistent in the other direction.

Yes, I've also considered this option when thinking about this thread,
but forcing a constraint creation up to the parent felt non-intuitive
to me as we force creation of catalog entries on the children based on
the state of the parent for basically everything else.  So introducing
a new path where we would do the reverse is a recipe for more complex
code in tablecmds.c, which I'd rather avoid.

> Here's a proposed patch for master only.  It turns all three situations
> being reported into ereport(ERROR); in one case I have an XXX comment,
> because we have an alternative when attaching a partition that already
> has a PK to a partitioned table that has a non-PK index: just create a
> separate index in the partition.  But that would cause slowness, which
> is probably undesirable.  I'm inclined to just remove the XXX comment,
> but if anyone has other thoughts, they are welcome.

An error sounds saner here in the long term.

Tests for all of the code paths involved, perhaps?  ;)
--
Michael

Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../Zn9SDY0r9fLTqqDO@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Zn9SDY0r9fLTqqDO@paquier.xyz>
Permalink:  ../Zn9SDY0r9fLTqqDO@paquier.xyz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Zn9SDY0r9fLTqqDO@paquier.xyz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, tndrwang@gmail.com, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #18500: Detaching a partition with an index manually attached to the parent's index triggers Assert
  In-Reply-To: <Zn9SDY0r9fLTqqDO@paquier.xyz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox