pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:52:16 -0400
Message-ID: <1846548.1617893536@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42affe76-48c4-a78c-e548-83a16b806af2@dunslane.net>
References: <E1lUEF5-00027L-N4@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<20210407225806.majgznh4lk34hjvu@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<1730972.1617836766@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAApHDvo4-Uqr3jPf7O0iHgy4igdGVRX8qYtkahqBws1sRnrRRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20210408015017.yb2tb324y6zt4o66@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<42affe76-48c4-a78c-e548-83a16b806af2@dunslane.net>

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 4/7/21 9:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I've wondered about that too. Perhaps we could reuse the pg_upgrade run?

> Honestly I'd prefer it if we could get rid of the rerun of 'make check'
> by pg_upgrade's test.sh and instead upgrade the data directory made by
> the earlier 'make check' run if it's still there (which would mean we'd
> need to stop it being deleted).

Good idea as far as speeding check-world and buildfarm runs, but I wonder
if we wouldn't be losing test coverage.  Seeing the number of times that
buildfarm runs have gotten through "make check" only to fail at the
re-run in pg_upgrade, it seems clear to me that there is something
different about the execution environment in the latter case.  I've
never been able to pin down quite what :-(

			regards, tom lane





view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1846548.1617893536@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1846548.1617893536@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1846548.1617893536@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andrew@dunslane.net, andres@anarazel.de, dgrowleyml@gmail.com, peter@eisentraut.org, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
  In-Reply-To: <1846548.1617893536@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox