From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian <momjian@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:54:12 -0700
Message-ID: <20090427185412.GP1539@fetter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904272150.14482.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <20090427162736.9DEF575407D@cvs.postgresql.org>
<20090427171027.GL1539@fetter.org>
<200904272150.14482.peter_e@gmx.net>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > "advanced" section? They've been standard for many years. Heck,
> > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > many years.
>
> Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> to mean basic.
Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic? Seriously?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: david@fetter.org, peter_e@gmx.net, momjian@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
In-Reply-To: <20090427185412.GP1539@fetter.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox