From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:25:57 +0900
Message-ID: <20200107002557.GB2386@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31057.1578341305@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1ioJS0-0005f9-7G@gemulon.postgresql.org>
<20200106045858.GJ3598@paquier.xyz>
<18698.1578287190@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<31057.1578341305@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are
> not out of the woods there:
>
> * prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl test [1], compared to 3:24
> in its last run with 0.9.8x. Why so much slower?
I have seen the tests being slower depending on the version of OpenSSL
pattern, though I think that it came with 1.1.0. I have no bothered
digging into that though, but I can notice the difference.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../20200107002557.GB2386@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
In-Reply-To: <20200107002557.GB2386@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox