agora inbox for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Masao Fujii <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:14:06 -0400
Message-ID: <506529.1789578846@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <217BB68C-9A50-4FA0-B096-818FAC61D85E@yesql.se>
References: <CAHGQGwH-wHTq4xd2dedEj0niDHkezcCT_OLmMpGp9NEHW4Dvkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1EEAFCFB-15DB-4EC1-BD49-964C799A01B2@yesql.se>
	<501934.1789573768@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<217BB68C-9A50-4FA0-B096-818FAC61D85E@yesql.se>

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 16 Sep 2026, at 17:49, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I can poke into it on longfin's host if that would help.

> That would be great, thanks.

What seems to be happening is

(1) pg_control_checkpoint()'s local values[] and nulls[] arrays
are now of length 19.

(2) But the tupdesc that get_call_result_type() builds from the
pg_proc entry still has 20 columns.

(3) Therefore, heap_form_tuple sees a wrong value for the 19th column
(which does no great damage, since it's still a pass-by-value type)
and then fetches complete garbage from values[19] and nulls[19].

Depending on the stack layout and the phase of the moon, nulls[19]
might read as zero or it might not.  Either case is fine so long as
heap_compute_data_size and heap_fill_tuple/fill_val interpret it the
same way.  However, what I'm seeing as I trace through the crash on
longfin is that nulls[19] has a value that's not either 0 or 1 (not
too surprising), and somehow heap_compute_data_size is interpreting
that as "true" while fill_val is reading it as "false".  According
to my understanding of the C standard, fill_val is in the wrong here.
I looked at the generated assembly code and could not spot exactly
what the problem is; it seems to be testing the byte value with

        .loc    0 301 7 is_stmt 1               ## heaptuple.c:301:7
        testb   %al, %al
        je      LBB3_6

which certainly looks like it ought to treat all nonzero values alike.
Anyway this seems to be a code generation quirk of certain versions of
clang.  It's probably not worth chasing further.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <506529.1789578846@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../506529.1789578846@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/506529.1789578846@sss.pgh.pa.us

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, daniel@yesql.se, masao.fujii@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions
  In-Reply-To: <506529.1789578846@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox