pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:17:04 -0500
Message-ID: <5187.1515028624@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18804.1515002619@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1eRwXy-0004IK-TO@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<20171221092940.gbxcszbzsr5khsfr@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<20171221095550.d3e7xhoakcowhu5b@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CAEepm=3eS6ra8oBCYsYYjPNsPqb2R_TaGQK8SGRFq_7gbP8RUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEepm=0WxwzpHVHt3PcWHBV=L3k3FDb6dvMq1A2Li49LGBa7TA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20171222082203.fl6rpzlqnm4h7h6h@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CAEepm=04WhyY65BpE2g_8E==ayhBXjV9JbyR-+9N4McmY3SQkQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<30219.1514428346@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAEepm=1OyZcCAxAEWYhmeg0qmWyYF2O2yW7s7A4uVTt-dgRRyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEepm=2H80cY=DncWKjoSiwaX=xbLcW7dqee+1H5-CQ6pJJnAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEepm=3GL7H3vxQb0LTJ9KnKhpnvaqOK=yn9p-O8zyjxRgXntA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30655.1514673257@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAEepm=3SeFvsfnnOLSA3tLtBe-rtyL=c+vfzyPCsViBjk521qw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4001.1514678419@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAEepm=2WFQrwDD4rEVKjdPBQ_di_0n=xYST1MDRsucZ=JgDPxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<18190.1514943510@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAEepm=34PDuR69kfYVhmZPgMdy8pSA-MYbpesEN1SR+2oj3Y+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<18804.1515002619@sss.pgh.! pa.us>

So this patch has been in place for two weeks, the buildfarm has still
got the measles, and we're entering the January commitfest with a lot
of other work to get done.  I realize that the two weeks were mostly
holiday time, but it's time to have some urgency about clearing the
buildfarm failures.

As best I understand, the remaining failures simply arise from
an unstable regression test case and aren't teaching us anything
of value.  I propose that for the moment, we simply remove the
failing query from join.sql.  We can put it back when there's
reason to think it will pass everywhere.

			regards, tom lane




view thread (66+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5187.1515028624@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../5187.1515028624@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5187.1515028624@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com, andres@anarazel.de
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
  In-Reply-To: <5187.1515028624@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox