From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org,Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve effici
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 23:04:47 +0100
Message-ID: <A1A957CC-C1E5-4164-A7DB-8BA418D50055@anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7216.1568066488@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1i7IqC-0000Uc-5H@gemulon.postgresql.org>
<CA+hUKG+9pN3=4Tw=mdPVkT86MB-04TED-hieY7ue8xL6gHkmAw@mail.gmail.com>
<C7955344-A83A-442F-8CE8-EFBEB5E024B1@anarazel.de>
<7216.1568066488@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Hi,
On September 9, 2019 11:01:28 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On September 9, 2019 10:51:26 PM GMT+01:00, Thomas Munro
><thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:32 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>>> Did this cause the following failure in eval-plan-qual on
>>> REL_12_STABLE?
>>>
>https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2019-09-09%2019%3A08%3A41
>
>Just saw that :-(
>
>> Argh, yes, probably. But it's just isolationtester I think, not a
>backed bug. Need to backport the recent fix in master to at least 12.
>> Tom, do you think we should backpatch both the order fix and the
>notice improvement, or just the former? And to which version?
>
>I think the first question is why is only prairiedog showing this.
We only saw the similar failure on master on a very small number of machines as well. Given The somewhat unusual way packets have to go out to be likely to be problematic, that's not too surprising.
>Let's not panic until we understand that.
If it's the packet ordering thing in isolationtester, then I think there's no need to panic, personally. And the output does look a lot like that.
>prairiedog looks to be about 20 minutes away from finishing the
>isolation tests for master, so that will be a useful data point
>as to whether there's any 12/HEAD difference. I'll dig deeper
>as soon as that run finishes.
Cool.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@anarazel.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: pgsql: Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve effici
In-Reply-To: <A1A957CC-C1E5-4164-A7DB-8BA418D50055@anarazel.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox