pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Catalog changes preparing for builtin collation provider.
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:51:31 -0700
Message-ID: <a4e4e1432c1c403318774f4b0c9b25a33e44e7fa.camel@j-davis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553991.1710191312@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1rj5WA-002z5V-WA@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<8899c7c62b86370076110920686fd24863b69a01.camel@j-davis.com>
	<1222780.1710047108@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<0ef325fa06e7a1605c4e119c4ecb637c67e5fb4e.camel@j-davis.com>
	<1553991.1710191312@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 17:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> 
> was perfectly correct as it stood, because pg_version is a
> PostgreSQL::Version object.  Why did you feel a need to
> editorialize on that?

The goal was to do a version check for 17 that's inclusive of
development versions.

Patch attached, following the example in AdjustUpgrade.pm. It feels a
bit inconsistent to sometimes use $oldnode->pg_version and sometimes
use $old_major_version, but it's certainly better than what I had done
in f696c0cd5f.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis

Attachments:

v1-0001-Another-fix-to-002_pg_upgrade.pl.patch (text/x-patch, 1.6K) download From ad3ba667553d8c2862b74939676244340631d192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Davis <jeff@j-davis.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:32:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v1] Another fix to 002_pg_upgrade.pl. Properly use PostgreSQL::Version, rather than the hacks introduced by f696c0cd5f. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1553991.1710191312@sss.pgh.pa.us Reported-by: Tom Lane --- src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/002_pg_upgrade.pl | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/002_pg_upgrade.pl b/src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/002_pg_upgrade.pl index 5ef78691cb..18335070c8 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/002_pg_upgrade.pl +++ b/src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/002_pg_upgrade.pl @@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ my $oldnode = PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster->new('old_node', install_path => $ENV{oldinstall}); -# Numeric major version of old cluster, ignoring "devel" suffix. -# Needed for testing upgrades from development version to itself. -my $old_major_version = int($oldnode->pg_version =~ s/devel//rg); +# Needed in some cases for testing upgrades from a development or beta +# version to itself. +my $old_major_version = PostgreSQL::Version->new($oldnode->pg_version->major); my %node_params = (); @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ my $original_locale = "C"; my $original_datlocale = ""; my $provider_field = "'c' AS datlocprovider"; my $old_datlocale_field = "NULL AS datlocale"; -if ($old_major_version >= 15 && $ENV{with_icu} eq 'yes') +if ($oldnode->pg_version >= 15 && $ENV{with_icu} eq 'yes') { $provider_field = "datlocprovider"; if ($old_major_version >= 17) -- 2.34.1

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <a4e4e1432c1c403318774f4b0c9b25a33e44e7fa.camel@j-davis.com>
Permalink:  ../a4e4e1432c1c403318774f4b0c9b25a33e44e7fa.camel@j-davis.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/a4e4e1432c1c403318774f4b0c9b25a33e44e7fa.camel@j-davis.com

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Catalog changes preparing for builtin collation provider.
  In-Reply-To: <a4e4e1432c1c403318774f4b0c9b25a33e44e7fa.camel@j-davis.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox