From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:17:20 -0400
Message-ID: <1015.1285186640@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9A622A.7030404@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <AANLkTimJVWSegpzD7ywO8S6AHfg8doQOVXQDem6xhkhc@mail.gmail.com>
<10904.1285108697@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<AANLkTi=K+NS7g5g=Z++eheA2A+5uLEPTmLsBq8ULGukA@mail.gmail.com>
<26043.1285169700@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<AANLkTimSMgvG_zgDyD3mc68g0sR6jzySo_wbRUHf=u=u@mail.gmail.com>
<1285177724-sup-6812@alvh.no-ip.org>
<4C9A622A.7030404@2ndquadrant.com>
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> BTW now that they are pestered with the PgFoundry commit messages, the
>> pgsql-committers archive do not seem a very useful resource anymore.
>> The Git "shortlog" seems much better, so maybe we should point to that.
> I missed why that happened in the first place, but based on being a
> subscriber isn't that something that should be split onto another list
> regardless?
IIRC, it was essentially a political decision, meant to help make
pgfoundry authors feel more like a part of the core project. Personally
I filter the non-core commits separately anyway...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, greg@2ndquadrant.com, alvherre@commandprompt.com, magnus@hagander.net, thom@linux.com
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
In-Reply-To: <1015.1285186640@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox