From: Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Documentation DTD
Date: 15 Aug 2002 15:33:11 -0400
Message-ID: <1029439992.18448.104.camel@jester> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208151938500.20055-100000@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208151938500.20055-100000@localhost.localdomain>
> > Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML
> > compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future.
>
> Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate. I look forward to it.
This one is pretty simple. It's been announced that the docbook group
isn't looking to continue with SGML. This is shown on the oasis-open
pages as well as their discussion in the mailing lists (xsltproc and fop
rather than jade and dsssl).
I prefer working with SGML, but not enough to try hacking away at
openjade to finish it off :)
Anyway, you're right about the patch. Lets apply it to the 7.4 tree
after branching.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: rbt@zort.ca, peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Documentation DTD
In-Reply-To: <1029439992.18448.104.camel@jester>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox