From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas F. O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:21:50 -0600
Message-ID: <1142896910.17883.168.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8773.1142896355@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <42D1F5FC-42DD-49D8-8509-0D68C5B9384C@sitening.com>
<8558.1142894925@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<2DD8310C-92A3-495D-8AA5-499E6E43B28C@sitening.com>
<8773.1142896355@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 17:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
> > What about the larger suggested change of breaking that section into
> > three more granular subsections? I could see commentary being
> > slightly more helpful for each.
>
> No particular opinion from here.
>
> Someone (was it Scott Marlowe?) recently volunteered to draft a
> complete restructuring of the admin docs --- so it would probably be
> better to think about this as part of that effort rather than a
> standalone change.
That was me, and I'm working on it right now, in the background.
If anyone has any input, I'd be glad to hear it. I'm still getting
docbooks setup on my laptop and such...
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tfo@sitening.com
Subject: Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
In-Reply-To: <1142896910.17883.168.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox