From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:51:28 -0800
Message-ID: <1165773088.13210.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612101825.17409.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <4579720E.4000707@dawninglight.net>
<200612101737.10958.peter_e@gmx.net>
<1165769484.13210.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<200612101825.17409.peter_e@gmx.net>
> > Until you can come up with a reason why we *shouldn't* move to XML. I
> > believe this issue is settled.
>
> I have previously listed the issues in favor and against. Check the
> start of this thread.
The only thing I see is that you don't want to move because all the
tools that are available for docbook sgml are also available for docbook
xml.
Am I missing anything?
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, peter_e@gmx.net, david@fetter.org, guillaume@lelarge.info, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
In-Reply-To: <1165773088.13210.62.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox