From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Edwin Martin <e.j.martin@chello.nl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:26:29 -0500
Message-ID: <12253.980349989@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0101240629180.4905-100000@paprika.michvhf.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0101240629180.4905-100000@paprika.michvhf.com>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I noticed it does not mention 7.0.3. Must be some strange old version.
>> Somone, please help explain this.
That text agrees with what was in release.sgml back around July (see
release.sgml version 1.57 ... ain't CVS wonderful?). That was after
the 7.0.* branch-off. So what we have here is documents generated from
the development tip that aren't being updated.
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes:
> The /docs directory is where the docs used to be. I was about to remove
> it when I noticed you guys were still maintaining FAQs and stuff in it.
We should get rid of the out-of-date documents, for sure. Maybe put in
a link to the ones that are kept up to date?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, vev@michvhf.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, e.j.martin@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
In-Reply-To: <12253.980349989@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox