From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: juha-pekka.eloranta@reaktor.fi
Subject: Synchronous Multimaster Replication
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 16:37:18 +0000
Message-ID: <156856543824.1274.12180817186798859836@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
Description:
Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
than that of a single (non-distributed) server?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, juha-pekka.eloranta@reaktor.fi
Subject: Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication
In-Reply-To: <156856543824.1274.12180817186798859836@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox