From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: juha-pekka.eloranta@reaktor.fi
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:06:42 -0400
Message-ID: <20191007220642.GB8554@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190928134740.GB26853@momjian.us>
References: <156856543824.1274.12180817186798859836@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
<20190928134740.GB26853@momjian.us>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 09:47:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:37:18PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
> > Description:
> >
> > Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
> > fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
> > syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
> > than that of a single (non-distributed) server?
>
> Very good point. I have improved the text with the attached patch. I
> also clarified the asynchronous case.
Patch applied thorough all current versions of the Postgres docs.
Thanks for the report.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, juha-pekka.eloranta@reaktor.fi, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication
In-Reply-To: <20191007220642.GB8554@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox