From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: drew.degraff@gmail.com
Subject: transaction example just pathetic
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:59:00 +0000
Message-ID: <168927474034.41167.1619293939597432027@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/tutorial-transactions.html
Description:
The explanation of transactions is pathetic. Why are you showing bad
design...then saying it doesn't matter. And then in your transaction
block, you only show one update statement. Well, you just could have shown
the complete example if you didn't have the two stupid branch updates to
begin with. And you want people to believe postgres is good, get its
documentation is so poor.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, drew.degraff@gmail.com
Subject: Re: transaction example just pathetic
In-Reply-To: <168927474034.41167.1619293939597432027@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox