From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: drew.degraff@gmail.com
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: transaction example just pathetic
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:33:50 +0200
Message-ID: <767c499fadc4dc03d18c346f7a9932dcddda4057.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168927474034.41167.1619293939597432027@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <168927474034.41167.1619293939597432027@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 18:59 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/tutorial-transactions.html
> Description:
>
> The explanation of transactions is pathetic. Why are you showing bad
> design...then saying it doesn't matter. And then in your transaction
> block, you only show one update statement. Well, you just could have shown
> the complete example if you didn't have the two stupid branch updates to
> begin with. And you want people to believe postgres is good, get its
> documentation is so poor.
The documentation is not half as bad as this unspecific problem report.
But I guess you are out to rant, not to get anything improved.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, drew.degraff@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: transaction example just pathetic
In-Reply-To: <767c499fadc4dc03d18c346f7a9932dcddda4057.camel@cybertec.at>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox