From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bibliography updates for new editions?
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:07:50 -0700
Message-ID: <20050216010750.GB13781@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050215171158.GA44655@winnie.fuhr.org>
References: <20050215022020.GA32064@winnie.fuhr.org>
<200502151057.35266.peter_e@gmx.net>
<20050215171158.GA44655@winnie.fuhr.org>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:11:58AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr:
> > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions?
> >
> > Sure. Please submit a patch.
>
> Will do. Just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be wasting anybody's
> time by doing so.
Should I update the biblioentry id's, or are they keys that shouldn't
be changed so other documents that refer to them don't need to be
updated? For example, should DATE94 remain the same, or should it
become DATE04 (or DATE2004)? I see that BOWMAN93 refers to a 1996
edition of that book, so I'm guessing the id's should remain untouched.
Just wanted to be sure, though.
Thanks.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Bibliography updates for new editions?
In-Reply-To: <20050216010750.GB13781@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox