public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Volkan YAZICI <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Really?  Do we intend applications to call it?
> 
> > Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> > applications to call it, why is it there?
> 
> If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
> with no documentation?

Not sure.  That's why its history needs to be researched.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox