From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:05:02 +0200
Message-ID: <200608091505.04383.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <969.1154659817@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <44B69778.5050104@dunslane.net>
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0608041040550.16622@linuxworld.com.au>
<969.1154659817@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Am Freitag, 4. August 2006 04:50 schrieb Tom Lane:
> I'd like to see us refactor the docs as necessary to reflect that idea.
> Peter is right that this needs some discussion in syntax.sgml as well as
> in the reference pages --- but I'm still not very clear on how the
> presentation should go.
I'm beginning to think that VALUES might be a separate command after all.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, swm@linuxworld.com.au, grzm@seespotcode.net, mail@joeconway.com, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
In-Reply-To: <200608091505.04383.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox