From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:37:57 +0200
Message-ID: <200710252337.57881.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710252010.l9PKAVn20205@momjian.us>
References: <200710252010.l9PKAVn20205@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let's not get sidetracked here. There was already agreement in
> advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
> discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not.
Advocacy opinions have no bearing on proper documentation writing. Nor
do I believe that there was an actual agreement.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, bruce@momjian.us, devrim@commandprompt.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
In-Reply-To: <200710252337.57881.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox