From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:10:14 +0100
Message-ID: <200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site>
References: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site>
Am Donnerstag, 8. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code
> and it is of course BSD licenced.
Why is that a reason for mentioning it more prominently? Is "code ownership"
a relevant property?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
In-Reply-To: <200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox