pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: The definition of PGDG
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:42:12 -0500
Message-ID: <200711081142.13183.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577300971a22a6b93645e8256220378@biglumber.com>
References: <1577300971a22a6b93645e8256220378@biglumber.com>

On Thursday 08 November 2007 10:38, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we
> > own the code and it is of course BSD licenced.
>
> As an aside, how can copyright be assigned to a non-defined
> group (a concept really, as near as I can tell). Is the PGDG
> actually defined anywhere yet? If not, anyone want to take
> a stab at it?
>
> IMHO, we need to get this resolved at some point - either have
> the code owned by their respective contributors (e.g. Linux)
> or by a legal entity (e.g. Apache Foundation). The former may
> be what we actually have anyway.
>
> Copying to advocacy as someone there may have the answer.

AFAICT we have the former (code is owned by respective owners). AIUI, in most 
European countries copyright is considered naturally given rights that you 
have and that you cannot give away.  In the U.S., you can give copy rights 
away, however you can only do so to a defined legal entity, of which the PGDG 
is not one.  This can change somewhat depending on country and depending upon 
employer agreements, but since no one is employed by the PGDG, it's mostly 
moot from what I can tell.  

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200711081142.13183.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Permalink:  ../200711081142.13183.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200711081142.13183.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: xzilla@users.sourceforge.net, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, greg@turnstep.com
  Subject: Re: The definition of PGDG
  In-Reply-To: <200711081142.13183.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox