From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:17:02 -0800
Message-ID: <20071129031702.GU24146@fetter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36e682920711281858x9a37039sa104036bf025de41@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20071128202615.GG24146@fetter.org>
<21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<36e682920711281858x9a37039sa104036bf025de41@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:58:26PM -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2007 3:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
> > seem like a good idea.
>
> Agreed.
Do you have an example of one use case where using RULEs rather than
TRIGGERs is a good idea?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: david@fetter.org, jonah.harris@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
In-Reply-To: <20071129031702.GU24146@fetter.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox