From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: "distributed checkpoint"
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:03:48 -0300
Message-ID: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
Am I the only one who finds the phrase "distributed checkpointing" a bit
awkward? Would it be better if we used "time-distributed checkpointing"
instead?
The phrase is used in the release notes, but it's not used anywhere in
the main docs.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
"Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "distributed checkpoint"
In-Reply-To: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox