From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:49:06 -0800
Message-ID: <200712130949.06970.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0712122054590.16644@westnet.com>
References: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org>
<200712121509.55019.josh@agliodbs.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0712122054590.16644@westnet.com>
Greg, All:
> The other problem was that the original description over-sold the feature
> a bit. It said "prevent I/O spikes" when it actually just reduces them.
> Still possible to have a spike, it probably won't be as big though. Your
> call on whether correcting that mischaracterization is worth bothering the
> translators over.
Sounds like I'd better. Sending out this afternoon.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
In-Reply-To: <200712130949.06970.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox