pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:11:07 -0800
Message-ID: <20110307181107.GB12122@fetter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=posYheJ5PS1FwOJmMKX93WKG_KRKYE2BoCeEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikUBhskJ8ALpr=KBc66toJ1CvmupTJFgaTXwc-d@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimE9vAC1Xb1Ge4weFJ4unExzsAUExFwk=L2NvVX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimWR2MXBqi-Ann2EYAyOmDNYXMOseNKoMmsq9tD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimPJ+SczkQd-7_kWQyrDvtrFYSXcmCfU74oZs1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110307175106.GA12122@fetter.org>
	<AANLkTi=posYheJ5PS1FwOJmMKX93WKG_KRKYE2BoCeEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:34:48PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> >> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
> >> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
> >> >>
> >> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes,
> >> >> so those have been included in this new patch.
> >> >
> >> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails....
> >>
> >> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm
> >> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in
> >> future?
> >
> > As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly
> > News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check,
> > so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least
> > CC'd, or better still, only posted, to -hackers.
> 
> I cross-posted as it's a docs change, but I want to invite the
> critical eye of those who dev'd it.  Okay, so doc patches should go
> exclusively to the -hackers list?  Last time I recall some disparity
> surrounding what I should be doing.

"Should" is a word I won't get into on this subject.  I was expressing
and justifying a personal preference :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20110307181107.GB12122@fetter.org>
Permalink:  ../20110307181107.GB12122@fetter.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20110307181107.GB12122@fetter.org

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: david@fetter.org, thom@linux.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections
  In-Reply-To: <20110307181107.GB12122@fetter.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox