pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: devguy.ca@gmail.com, "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: inappropriate word 'victim'
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 20:17:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20171004001750.GR4628@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29011.1507071942@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20171003193804.28564.41434@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
	<0af35b7c-9421-ed87-34cd-9f73f21e3d71@commandprompt.com>
	<CAKFQuway5VR-r9HYcSKwFLoroDAm26Ln_VUvgwD3xc+HpWfB4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<0d692205-5ec3-55aa-51cb-d029eb93cd12@commandprompt.com>
	<E39E8962-335D-46FA-BF49-29206A0A7990@postgresql.org>
	<29011.1507071942@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>

Tom, all,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
> > So there is a precedent for using “target” for this command.
> 
> I wouldn't object to substituting "target" for "victim"; they're both
> pretty specific, and there's little risk of misunderstanding which
> database is meant.  I don't know if that amounts to much of an
> advance in political correctness, though.

Based on my review of what 'dict' returns for each, 'target' is
distinctly more appropriate.  Both definitions in WordNet for
'victim' refer to a 'person' and other dictionaries definitely
refer to 'person or living creature' more than not.

The definitions for 'target', on the other hand, more generally refer to
a goal or something which is being shot at and the references to
'person' in those definitions appears more in the vein of "covering all
bases" as it relates to 'person, place, or thing'.

> I'm less happy about substituting vaguer words like "subject".
> Particularly for non-native English speakers, that seems like it
> could be confusing --- eg, if you know the distinction between
> subject and object of a sentence, you might think it means the
> DB where the command is being issued.

Agreed.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download

view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20171004001750.GR4628@tamriel.snowman.net>
Permalink:  ../20171004001750.GR4628@tamriel.snowman.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20171004001750.GR4628@tamriel.snowman.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jkatz@postgresql.org, jd@commandprompt.com, david.g.johnston@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: inappropriate word 'victim'
  In-Reply-To: <20171004001750.GR4628@tamriel.snowman.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox