From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: osdba <mailtch@163.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:19:07 -0400
Message-ID: <20200822031907.GA12615@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821231616.GK13363@momjian.us>
On 2020-Aug-21, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 04:49:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:14:56PM +0800, osdba wrote:
> > > "range_opsany range type&& &> &< >> << <@ -|- = @> @>"， exist double "@>"，
> > >
> > > Should be "<@ @>" ?
> >
> > Indeed, this needs to be improved. Another issue on the same page is
> > that point_ops lists the same operator three times, <@. Other index
> > pages don't seem to have any inconsistencies, fortunately.
>
> I decided to remove the duplicates and just add "(multiple)" after
> operators that have multiple system table entries; patch attached.
Now that we can point people to psql's \dAo, do we really need to have
these tables at all?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, bruce@momjian.us, michael@paquier.xyz, mailtch@163.com
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
In-Reply-To: <20200822031907.GA12615@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox