From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: osdba <mailtch@163.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:59:02 -0400
Message-ID: <20200822185902.GA11024@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2208818.1598117220@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2020-Aug-22, Tom Lane wrote:
> If you don't want to go all the way and list the operators with their
> input types, maybe we should just do what the OP thought was correct
> and delete the duplicate operator names. It's already the case that
> the table isn't telling you exactly which input types the operators
> accept, so why not be a little bit fuzzier?
Well, if we're going to have a table, let's have a useful table. What's
wrong with using the same contents \dAo shows? It seemed reasonable
enough to me.
Now of course I would suggest that other client programs such as pgAdmin
ought to display what \dAo shows too ;-)
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, michael@paquier.xyz, mailtch@163.com
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
In-Reply-To: <20200822185902.GA11024@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox