From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:09:54 +0900
Message-ID: <20200914080954.GF2183@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUevEykWUSX2p1Eocizntf12bwvobWEV3h_K3ObJV5AUAXwHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJSLCQ2TPaK_K8raofCamrqELCxY-H6mJrpDNRzc-LKpPY7c+g@mail.gmail.com>
<20200912014550.GL2743@paquier.xyz>
<CABUevEykWUSX2p1Eocizntf12bwvobWEV3h_K3ObJV5AUAXwHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> In particular, why is the primary a "server" and the replica a "node"? That
> caught my eye for inconsistency -- but changing node to cluster will be
> equally inconsistent, just in a different way. Why not just call them both
> servers?
Makes sense.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, magnus@hagander.net, rob@xzilla.net
Subject: Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications
In-Reply-To: <20200914080954.GF2183@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox