From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: ramkly@yahoo.com
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade is not correct
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:42:27 -0500
Message-ID: <20201216234227.GI4527@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160739721042.708.4306720394513934628@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <160739721042.708.4306720394513934628@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 03:13:30AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/pgupgrade.html
> Description:
>
> If we use the following command to upgrade the standby server, then new
> cluster will create by old_cluster which is not correct.
> rsync --archive --delete --hard-links --size-only --no-inc-recursive
> old_cluster new_cluster remote_dir
> I used following command and this one is correct:
> rsync --archive --delete --hard-links --size-only --no-inc-recursive
> new_cluster old_cluster remote_dir
> So the only thing need to change is the place of old_cluster and new_cluster
> in rsync command.
I am not sure how to reply. These instructions have been unchanged for
a few years. Why is the order you suggest correct?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, ramkly@yahoo.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade is not correct
In-Reply-To: <20201216234227.GI4527@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox