From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Change draft gmake control
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:19:16 -0500
Message-ID: <23143.1169932756@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701272033.l0RKXox24521@momjian.us>
References: <200701272033.l0RKXox24521@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, if 'draft' was only for html, I could see suggesting just 'gmake
> draft', but 'draft' can be used for Postscript and PDF too.
But those aren't cases where saving some typing is useful (in fact,
I'd bet money that no one will ever use them). Draft runs with html
output are highly useful, and like Peter I think "make draft" ought
to work for that.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Change draft gmake control
In-Reply-To: <23143.1169932756@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox