pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Mija Lee <mija@scharp.org>
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:25:16 -0400
Message-ID: <24184.1191281116@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1191264888.4260.69.camel@ebony.site>
References: <25517.1191038302@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<47012AC5.9040808@agliodbs.com>
	<1191263814.4260.57.camel@ebony.site>
	<1191264888.4260.69.camel@ebony.site>

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html

Not a whole lot of technical content there, but pretty interesting
nonetheless.  I *think* that the issues we're seeing are largely in the
NFS client-side kernel code, so bypassing that stack as Oracle is doing
might eliminate the problem.  Of course, there's a sizable amount of
code to be written to do that ...

			regards, tom lane



view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <24184.1191281116@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../24184.1191281116@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/24184.1191281116@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com, josh@agliodbs.com, mija@scharp.org
  Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
  In-Reply-To: <24184.1191281116@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox