From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:17:38 -0500
Message-ID: <24889.1196288258@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071128205710.GL24146@fetter.org>
References: <20071128202615.GG24146@fetter.org>
<21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20071128205710.GL24146@fetter.org>
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:53:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
>> seem like a good idea.
> It does to me. I haven't found a case yet where rules worked even as
> well as triggers.
I don't have a problem with emphasizing triggers as the preferred
solution, but we should keep the older example, if only because people
are going to see DB schemas that use that approach, and they won't
understand what's going on (or realize they could convert) if they've
not seen an example.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david@fetter.org, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
In-Reply-To: <24889.1196288258@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox