From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: shtoorman.sam@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 11:14:09 -0500
Message-ID: <3452214.1673108049@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167309066389.659.17813482601797183601@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <167309066389.659.17813482601797183601@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
> 8.5.2
> ...
> "The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
> hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
> hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"
"Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, shtoorman.sam@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
In-Reply-To: <3452214.1673108049@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox