From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: tristan.chambers@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Explicit or implicit?
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 12:50:48 -0500
Message-ID: <3468877.1637517048@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163742474559.26193.12547875443867026853@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <163742474559.26193.12547875443867026853@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> "The @@ operator also supports text input, allowing explicit conversion of a
> text string to tsvector or tsquery to be skipped in simple cases."I believe
> that the text is saying implicit, but uses the word "explicit" instead. Is
> this a typo? Thanks.
I think it's intended. The point is that instead of, say,
tsvector_column @@ 'query here'::tsquery
you could just write
tsvector_column @@ 'query here'
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tristan.chambers@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Explicit or implicit?
In-Reply-To: <3468877.1637517048@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox