From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Paul Govereau <pgoverea@akamai.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 07:11:52 +0000
Message-ID: <3A517F38.8CE020E0@alumni.caltech.edu> (raw)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012302007350.776-100000@peter.localdomain>
<3794.978206926@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support
> only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1. UNDER is adding no
> functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword
> for non-SQL semantics.
I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in
truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser.
- Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, pgoverea@akamai.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
In-Reply-To: <3A517F38.8CE020E0@alumni.caltech.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox