From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Philipp Gramzow <phil@philphonic.de>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: incoorect restore_command
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:15:59 +0900
Message-ID: <3c8a08bb-3eaa-cdc6-08f9-3298342722c2@oss.nttdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDYFuW+6Y72vRk9Q@paquier.xyz>
References: <161397938841.15451.13129264141285167267@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
<YDXo2tIJmkW6mhkm@paquier.xyz>
<478b5b00-5ab3-a1b5-65f4-19b4409c720b@philphonic.de>
<YDYFuW+6Y72vRk9Q@paquier.xyz>
On 2021/02/24 16:52, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:24:17AM +0100, Philipp Gramzow wrote:
>> I agree, using a proper extension would be more straightforward. I'm sure
>> that's the reason why someone changed our archive_command.
>
> Okay, let's do so in the docs then. Others may have comments to
> offer, so I'll first wait a bit before applying my suggestion from
> upthread.
I agree with this change.
But I have one question; why do those commands use different
archive directories? Isn't it better to use the same one?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, michael@paquier.xyz, phil@philphonic.de, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: incoorect restore_command
In-Reply-To: <3c8a08bb-3eaa-cdc6-08f9-3298342722c2@oss.nttdata.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox