public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: xmlagg documentation
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:28 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> I just noticed that the xmlagg function is not documented. (Here is a random
> piece of documentation for those who are not familiar with what it does:
> http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_XMLAGG.html) I'm wondering whether we
> should put this with the aggregate functions or the XML functions, or both,
> in some way. Any ideas?
It doesn't seem to fit with the other aggregate functions, so I think
I'd vote for documenting it with the XML functions.
regards, tom lane
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: xmlagg documentation
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox