public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedxmlagg documentation
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* xmlagg documentation
@ 2008-06-16 09:49 Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2008-06-16 09:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
I just noticed that the xmlagg function is not documented. (Here is a random
piece of documentation for those who are not familiar with what it does:
http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_XMLAGG.html) I'm wondering whether we
should put this with the aggregate functions or the XML functions, or both,
in some way. Any ideas?
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: xmlagg documentation
@ 2008-06-16 13:53 Tom Lane <[email protected]>
parent: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2008-06-16 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> I just noticed that the xmlagg function is not documented. (Here is a random
> piece of documentation for those who are not familiar with what it does:
> http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_XMLAGG.html) I'm wondering whether we
> should put this with the aggregate functions or the XML functions, or both,
> in some way. Any ideas?
It doesn't seem to fit with the other aggregate functions, so I think
I'd vote for documenting it with the XML functions.
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-16 13:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-16 09:49 xmlagg documentation Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-06-16 13:53 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox