From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar@frodo.hserus.net>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:43:10 +0530
Message-ID: <40371316.1040709@frodo.hserus.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40363AAE.4010004@commandprompt.com>
References: <20040220151609.41601.qmail@web13125.mail.yahoo.com>
<40363AAE.4010004@commandprompt.com>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
>> takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
>> documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
>> (almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?
>
>
> I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend
> support.
>
> Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
> doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.
>
> Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a
> minute.
I have used xercess-C++ in my current project and I can tell you one thing. It's
object model is broken.
It is a fine API in general but the way it's object model is broken, makes me
hate it.. really..
Given a better choice I wouldn't use it. But I haven't used any other XML
toolkits either. My XML experience is pretty limited..
Shridhar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: shridhar@frodo.hserus.net
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
In-Reply-To: <40371316.1040709@frodo.hserus.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox